Research on Bibliometric Analysis of Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) in Learning Physics in the Last Ten Years
Abstract
Objective: Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) is the most widely used argumentation pattern and was first used in science education. TAP has a significant contribution as literature in explaining the concept of argumentation. This study aims to identify the contribution and describe the research profile of applying TAP in physics education during the last ten years. Method: The method used in this research is a bibliometric analysis based on Scopus data with the help of MS Excel and VOSviewer. The results of this study obtained 67 documents related to TAP. Results: Based on the results of bibliometric data visualization related to TAP, 4 clusters (1) discuss TAP focused on learning processes and activities in the classroom. (2) the application of TAP focused on assessing argumentation and critical thinking skills (3) TAP was associated with the identification of the components of scientific argumentation (4) TAP related to contextual problem-solving in improving scientific literacy. Novelty: Physics is the subject that appears the most in research related to the use of TAP, among other science subjects. Based on the results of this study, TAP has several contributions to physics learning in improving students' argumentation skills so that it can be an opportunity for further research. That way, the next one will be able to discuss more deeply related to the TAP, which is applied to physics learning to improve argumentation and critical thinking skills.
Abstract View: 153 
PDF Download: 145
Similarity Check Download: 17
References
Abdollahzadeh, E., Farsani, M. A., & Beikmohammadi, M. (2017). Argumentative writing behavior of graduate EFL. Argumentation, 31, 641-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9415-5
Admoko, S, Suprapto, N., Deta, U. A., Achmadi, H. R., & Hariyono, E. (2021a). Using Toulmin's argument pattern approach to identify infodemics in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805(1), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012011
Admoko, S., Mukhayyarotin, N. R. J., & Madlazim, E. H. (2021b). Bibliometric profile of science education research on argumentation and the contribution of Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211215.085
Ain, T. N., Wibowo, H. A. C., Rohman, A., & Deta, U. A. (2018). The scientific argumentation profile of physics teacher candidate in Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012025
Atabey, N. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of the articles in the field of argumentation in science. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 12(45), 766–789. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2968
Bermani, R. A. (2017). An analysis of argument structure of research article of English postgraduate program of Bengkulu University published in the journal. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 2(2), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v2i2.5954
Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st-century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
Chan, J., & Erduran, S. (2022). The impact of collaboration between science and religious education teachers on their understanding and views of argumentation. Research in Science Education, 53, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10041-1
Chun, H., & Sauder, M. (2021). The logic of quantification: Institutionalizing numerical thinking. Theory and Society, 51, 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09453-1
Dunac, P. S., & Demir, K. (2013). Stacking up against alternative conceptions: Using Uno cards to introduce discourse and argumentation. Physics Education, 48(6), 736–745. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/6/736
Erdoğan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C skills of the 21st century into four language skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v2i2.4498
Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2017). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353
Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., & Saptono, S. (2022). Scientific argumentation measurement pattern of pre-service elementary school teachers: A literature review. International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, 8(1), 692–699.
Gonçalves, D., & Silva, C. V. (2015). Future teachers' perceptions of the pedagogical use of digital textbooks in the learning process. Dialnet.
Guilfoyle, L., Erduran, S., Park, W., Guilfoyle, L., & Erduran, S. (2020). An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education argumentation in science and religious education. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 42(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2020.1805925
Hakim, A. R., Widodo, W., & Sunarti, T. (2022). Profile of Toulmin s scientific arguments students and technological utilities in global warming topic. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 12(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v12n1.p85-99
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2019). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students' conceptual understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.6
Jan, H., & Jrf, N. (2017). Teacher of 21st century: Characteristics and development. Research on Humanities and Social Science, 7(9), 50–54.
Janssen, D., & Graaff, R. D. (2021). The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education. System, 101, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576
Kulakli, A., & Osmanaj, V. (2020). Global research on big data in relation to artificial intelligence (a bibliometric study : 2008-2019) literature review: Big data and artificial intelligence. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 16(2), 2008–2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i02.12617
Küng, T., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021). ArgueTutor: An adaptive dialog-based learning system for argumentation skills. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 683, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445781
Lazarou, D., & Erduran, S. (2020). Me to know: Evaluating students’ arguments based on science teachers' adaptations to Toulmin’s argument pattern. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 306-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1820663
Lentika, D. L., & Admoko, S. (2022). Development of newton gravity student worksheets on problem-based learning model to improve students’ scientific argumentation skills. PRISMA Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran MIPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5349
Machmuda, A., Burhanudin, M. A., Ahman, E., Mulyadi, H., & Bisnis, P. (2022). Teaching factory in vocational high school : Bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomu Undiksha, 14(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v14i1.42385
Mardiati, Y., Herlanti, Y., & Qodriyah, A. L. (2022). Student argumentation skills’ analysis on the discussion of socio-scientific issues in the concept of viruses. Jurnal Biolokus, 5(2), 150–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v5i2.1945
Maryono, M., & Surajiman, S. (2017). Kolaborasi internal, domestik dan internasional serta korelasinya dengan sitasi yang diperoleh: Analisis publikasi UGM di scopus. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 13(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.27492
Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 33(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1242392
Moon, A., Stanford, C., Cole, R., & Towns, M. (2016). The nature of students’ chemical reasoning employed in scientific argumentation in physical chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00207a
Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S., Swearingen, A., Wei, L., & Butler, A. M. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through quality talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21471
Nation, M. T., & Feldman, A. (2021). Environmental education in the secondary science classroom : How teachers ' beliefs influence their instruction of climate change environmental education in the secondary science classroom: How teachers ’ beliefs influence their instruction of climate change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1854968
Nugroho, P. A. (2019). Sitasi peneliti universitas airlangga (bidang social science) tahun 2018 di database scopus serta korelasinya dengan jurnal yang dilanggan oleh perpustakaan universitas airlangga. VisiPustaka, 21(3), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.37014/visipustaka.v21i3.589
Rapanta, C. (2019). Argumentation strategies in the classroom. Vernon Press.
Rubini, B., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2022). Socio scientific issues-based argumentation assessment for middle school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 1034-1041. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.844
Rudsberg, K., ÖHman, J., & ÖStman, L. (2013). Analyzing students' learning in classroom discussions about socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 97(4), 594–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21065
Shahriyor, Z. O. K. (2022). Importance of wordplay in the English language (in the example of pun). Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 3(6), 869–873.
Soysal, Y. (2021). An exploration of the determinants of middle school students’ argument quality by classroom discourse analysis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 343–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1908981
Suprapto, N., Sukarmin, S., Puspitawati, R. P., Erman, E., Savitri, D., Ku, C. H., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Research trend on TPACK through bibliometric analysis (2015-2019). International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.22062
Syerliana, L., Muslim, M., & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using "Toulmin Argumentation Pattern" analysis of high school students at Subang on the topic of hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Vassiliades, A., & Bassiliades, N. (2021). Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: A survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 36(5), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888921000011
Vera, N., Liando, F., & Tatipang, D. P. (2022). English or Indonesian language? Parents’ perception toward children s second language learning context. Jurnal Ilmiah Lingua Idea, 13(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2022.13.1.5749
Wahyuna, W. M. T., Hakim, A. R., Wulansari, N. I., Solahuddin, M. I., & Admoko, S. (2021). Analisis keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik pada model pembelajaran berbasis toulmin’s argumentation pattern (TAP) dalam memahami konsep fisika dengan metode library research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.79-91
Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study of claims and qualifiers in ESL students ' argumentative writing based on the toulmin model. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00133-w
Yulianci, S., Asriyadin, A., Nurjumiati, N., Kaniawati, I., Liliawati, L., & Muliana, M. (2020). Preliminary analysis of module development by setting arguments through the application of scientific inquiry models to improve students' scientific attitudes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012021
Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post-COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Current Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 153 times
PDF downloaded = 145 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 17 times
