Are Argumentation Skills Can Describe Understanding Concepts?
Abstract
Objective: Based on the several aspects, one aspect is quite important in the process of learning science, namely communicating. Argumentation is one of communication skills. Are argumentation can describe understanding concepts? Method: This study uses a literature review method from thirteen articles. Results: Argumentation skills can describe understanding concepts. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient shows that argumentation skills strongly correlate with understanding concepts. It is because argumentation skills positively correlate with critical thinking and logic skills. Argumentation skills can improve students' critical thinking level and logical skills in the thinking process. Everyone has good argumentation skills if has good critical thinking and good logic skills. Novelty: Argumentation skills are one of the communication skills that improve understanding of concepts. Argumentation skills are moderators for high-order thinking skills. It can occur because the components of argumentation skills are claim, evidence, and reasoning. Someone can meet all the argumentation skills components with good thinking.
Abstract View: 69 
PDF Download: 89
Similarity Check Download: 3
References
Al-Ajmi, B., & Ambusaidi, A. (2019). The level of scientific argumentation skills in chemistry. Science Education International, 33(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7
Al-Husban, N. A. (2020). Critical thinking skills in asynchronous discussion forums: A case study. International Journal of Technology in Education, 3(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.v3i2.22
Allchin, D., & Zemplén, G. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science. Science Education, 104(5), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589
Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), 21–39.
Amin, A. M. ., Majid, I. ., Hujjatusnaini, N., & Adiansyah, R. (2023). The correlation between the character and self-efficacy of pre-service biology teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5157–5162. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.2999
Anita, A., Afandi, A., & Tenriawaru, A. B. (2019). Pentingnya keterampilan argumentasi di era ledakan informasi digital. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 1-10.
Apriliani, N., Suharsono, S., & Diella, D. (2019). Hubungan penguasaan konsep dengan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik pada sub konsep kelainan respirasi manusia. Seminar Nasional Biologi, Saintek, dan Pembelajarannya (SN-Biosper) Tahun 2019, 326-331.
Arytunova, A., & Gykasyan, S. (2021). Development of logical thinking in primary school students in mathematics lessons. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(2), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.52376/978-5-907419-23-0_056
Baguma, R., Bagarukayo, E., Namubiru, P., Brown, C., & Mayisela, T. (2019). Using whatsapp in teaching to develop higher order thinking skills-a literature review using the activity theory lens. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 15(2), 98–116.
Bayram-Jacobs, D., Henze, I., Evagorou, M., Shwartz, Y., Aschim, E. L., Alcaraz-Dominguez, S., Barajas, M., & Dagan, E. (2019). Science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207–1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21550
Bencze, L., Pouliot, C., Pedretti, E., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., & Zeidler, D. (2020). SAQ, SSI and STSE education: Defending and extending “science-in-context.” Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 825–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09962-7
Bodé, N. E., Deng, J. M., & Flynn, A. B. (2019). Getting past the rules and to the WHY: Causal mechanistic arguments when judging the plausibility of organic reaction mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00719
Chin, M., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through student’s question in science classroom. Journal of The Learning Science, 19(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530036
Coy, D., Malekpour, S., Saeri, A. K., & Dargaville, R. (2021). Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes. Energy Research and Social Science, 72, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101871
Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2022). Developing students’ critical thinking skills and argumentation abilities through augmented reality–based argumentation activities in science classes. Springer Netherlands.
Dewantari, T., Hasnunidah, N., & Maulina, D. (2022). Kajian kemampuan argumentasi siswa pada materi pokok animalia melalui pendekatan saintifik di SMA dengan peringkat akreditasi yang berbeda. BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 5(1), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v5i1.3285
Dökmecioğlu, B., Tas, Y., & Yerdelen, S. (2022). Predicting students’ critical thinking dispositions in science through their perceptions of constructivist learning environments and metacognitive self-regulation strategies: a mediation analysis. Educational Studies, 48(6), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1833838
Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan kemampuan penalaran dengan keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada konsep sistem pencernaan melalui PBL (problem based learning). Biodidaktika, Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v13i2.3677
Eslami, T., Mirjalili, V., Fong, A., Laird, A. R., & Saeed, F. (2019). ASD-DiagNet: A hybrid learning approach for detection of autism spectrum disorder using fMRI Data. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2019.00070
Fitria, Y., & Malik, A. (2022). Analysis of difficulties in logical thinking ability in learning natural science faced by students of elementary education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1295
Fjelland, R. (2020). Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0494-4
García-Feijoo, M., Eizaguirre, A., & Rica-Aspiunza, A. (2020). Systematic review of sustainable-development-goal deployment in business schools. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010440
Gericke, N., Högström, P., & Wallin, J. (2022). A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 245–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125
Ginanjar, W. S., & Utari, S. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran ipa untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 32-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559
Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v17i1.16108
Haruna, A., & Nahadi. (2021). Menjelajahi hubungan level argumentasi dengan kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal ikatan kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2686–2694. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i1.24156
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2019). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.6
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Shack, K. (2020). Mindfulness and creativity: Implications for thinking and learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100689
Kaeppel, K. (2021). The influence of collaborative argument mapping on college students’ critical thinking about contentious arguments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100809
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science and Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
Kim, N. J., Vicentini, C. R., & Belland, B. R. (2022). Influence of scaffolding on information literacy and argumentation skills in virtual field trips and problem-based learning for scientific problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10145-y
Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
Lacerda, G., Petrillo, F., Pimenta, M., & Guéhéneuc, Y. G. (2020). Code smells and refactoring: A tertiary systematic review of challenges and observations. Journal of Systems and Software, 167, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110610
Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7
Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5
Maknun, J. (2020). Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to improve understanding physics concepts and critical thinking skill of vocational high school students. International Education Studies, 13(6), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p117
Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625
Munawati, A. (2019). The effectiveness of HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) in teaching reading comprehension. Education of English as a Foreign Language, 2(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.educafl.2019.002.1.5
Nahar, S., Suhendri, Zailani, & Hardivizon. (2022). Improving students’ collaboration thinking skill under the implementation of the quantum teaching model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15325a
Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: Teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218865
Nopriana, T., Firmasari, S., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2021). Profile of hard skills and soft skills of mathematics education students. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v10i1.6460
Noroozi, O. (2022). The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(4), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2092188
Nugroho, O. F., Permanasari, A., & Firman, H. (2019). The movement of stem education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19252
Nussbaum, E. M. (2021). Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173
Orgill, M. K., York, S., & Mackellar, J. (2019). Introduction to systems thinking for the chemistry education community. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2720–2729. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00169
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2020). A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics. Educational Research Review, 30, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329
Paramita, A. K., Yahmin, Y., & Dasna, I. W. (2021). Pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dengan pendekatan stem (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) untuk pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan argumentasi siswa SMA pada materi laju reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(11), 1652-1665. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14189
Ping, I. L. L., Halim, L., & Osman, K. (2020). Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach in developing argumentation skills, science process skills and biology understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v9i1.31612
Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., & Zu Belzen, A. U. (2020). A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490
Quinn, S., Hogan, M., Dwyer, C., Finn, P., & Fogarty, E. (2020). Development and validation of the student-educator negotiated critical thinking dispositions scale (SENCTDS). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100710
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Rahayu, S., & Purwanto, J. (2013). Identifikasi model mental siswa SMA kelas X pada materi hukum newton tentang gerak. Kaunia: Integration and Interconnection Islam and Science Journal, 9(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.14421/kaunia.1051
Rahayu, Y., Suhendar, S., & Ratnasari, J. . (2020). Keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada materi sistem gerak SMA negeri kabupaten sukabumi-indonesia. Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 6(3), 312-318. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i3.9802
Rapanta, C. (2021). Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum? Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404
Ristanto, R. H., Ahmad, A. S., & Komala, R. (2022). Critical thinking skills of environmental changes: A biological instruction using guided discovery learning-argument mapping (GDL-AM). Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.10.9.1
Rizaldi, D. R., Nurhayati, E., & Fatimah, Z. (2020). The correlation of digital literation and STEM integration to improve indonesian students’ skills in 21st century. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i2.36
Rohaeti, E. E., Hindun, S., & Fitriani, N. (2019). Correlation of self-efficacy and mathematical critical thinking skills based on student’s cognitive stage. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012034
Sanjayanti, A., Rustaman, N. Y., & Hidayat, T. (2019). 6E learning by design in facilitating logical thinking and identifying algae. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139841
Sanjayanti, A., Rustaman, N., & Hidayat, T. (2020). Equipping students’ research skills and logical thinking through practical work on algae topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042035
Saphira, H. V., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). Profile of senior high school students’ critical thinking skills and the need of implementation PBL model assisted by augmented reality book. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.25031
Sarira, P. M., Priyayi, D. F., & Astuti, S. P. (2019). Hubungan argumentasi ilmiah dan hasil belajar kognitif pada penerapan model problem based learning (PBL). Edu Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v7i2.1258
Setiadi, I., & Elmawati, D. (2019). Discovery learning method for training critical thinking skills of students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(3), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3345924
Suherman, S., Prananda, M. R., Proboningrum, D. I., Pratama, E. R., Laksono, P., & Amiruddin. (2020). Improving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) with project based learning (PjBL) Model Assisted by Geogebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012027
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
Suraya, S., Setiadi, A. E., & Muldayanti, N. D. (2019). Argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis melalui metode debat. Edusains, 11(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.10479
Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. Cambridge Publishing.
Winarti, N., & Yundayani, A. (2021). Korelasi antara keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan keterampilan menulis teks argumentatif. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara III, 144–152.
Yaniawati, P., Kariadinata, R., Sari, N. M., Pramiarsih, E. E., & Mariani, M. (2020). Integration of e-learning for mathematics on resource-based learning: Increasing mathematical creative thinking and self-confidence. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11915
Zhai, X., Yin, Y., Pellegrino, J. W., Haudek, K. C., & Shi, L. (2020). Applying machine learning in science assessment: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 56(1), 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1735757
Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H. S. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers and Education, 143, 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Current Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 69 times
PDF downloaded = 89 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 3 times
