Author Guidelines

About Styles

The following writing and referencing rules are to be taken into consideration.

Click here for Manuscript Template 

The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously. If the article has been presented at any seminar or conference, the name of the conference, the institution where it has been presented and the date of the presentation needs to be mentioned. The Journal is written in English or Indonesia.

The title of the article must be written in capital letters, using font size 14 and bold. One line space must be left after the title. The name and surname of the author(s), and the institution.

The number of pages of the article must 10-15, not exceed 25, including abstract, reference, and author profile list. The whole work must be written in Book Antiqua, font size 12. Subheading must be in bold, and the first letter of each word must be capital letters.

All the text must be written using single line spacing, including the reference list. The research article should normally consist of the following parts: introduction, research method , findings, discussion, and conclusion.

Title Article

Writing the title of the article using the font "book antiqua" 14 pt, below it is written the author's name with a font size of 10 pt and affiliation, city, country with a font size of 9 pt

Abstract

The abstract must be brief, informative and self-explanatory and should be written in the past tense. It must not exceed 150-200 words in length and should concisely summarize all-important results of the paper without excessive methodical and experimental details. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be avoided.

Keywords

Beside abstract, about 3 to 7 keywords characterizing the paper should be listed.

INTRODUCTION / مقدمة  [Font Book Antiqua 12, bold]

The introduction contains the purpose of the study and why the study is conducted. The main section of an article should start with an introductory section which provides more details about the paper’s purposes, motivation, research methods and findings. The introduction should be relatively nontechnical, yet clear enough for an informed reader to understand the manuscript’s contribution.

In general, the article in JIDeR Journal is written in English and Arabic. The article also consists of 1 column, using ”Book Antiqua”, font size 11, and space 1

This template is designed to assist the author in preparing manuscript; it is an exact representation of the format expected by the editor. To use this template, please just Save As the MS Word file to the document, then copy and paste the document here. To copy and paste the text to this template document, please use “Special Paste” and choose “Unformated Text”.

All papers submitted to the journal should be written in good English. For the authors that their native language is not English are encouraged to have their paper that is checked grammatically and clarity. English language and copyediting services can be provided by: International Editing and Asia Editing. The work should not have been published or submitted for free publication. The official language of the manuscript to be published in JIDeR journal is English and Arabic.

In Introduction, Authors should state the objectives of the work at the end of introduction section. Before the objective, Authors should provide an adequate background, and brief literature survey in order to record the existing solutions/method, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what is the achievement (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results.

THEORETICAL SUPPORT / إطار نظري

Theoretical support or literature review represents the theoretical core of an article. The purpose of a literature review is to “look again” at what other researchers have done regarding a specific topic. A literature review is a means to an end, namely to provide background to and serve as motivation for the objectives and hypotheses that guide your own research.

A good literature review does not merely summarise relevant previous research. In the literature review, the researcher critically evaluates, re-organizes and synthesizes the work of others.

 METHOD / منهج

Materials and methods should make readers be able to reproduce the experiment. It should be provided sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods that already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described. Do not repeat the details of established methods.

Identify Subsections

It is both conventional and expedient to divide the method section into labeled subsections. These usually include a section with descriptions of the participants or subjects and a section describing the procedures used in the study. The latter section often includes description of (a) any experimental manipulations or inter-ventions used and how they were delivered-for example, any mechanical apparatus used to deliver them; (b) sampling procedures and sample size and precision; (c) measurement approaches (including the psychometric properties of the instruments used); and (d) the research design. If the design of the study is complex or the stimuli require detailed description, additional subsections or subheadings that divide the subsections may be warranted to help readers find specific information.

These subsections include the essential information to comprehend and replicate the study. Insufficient detail will make the reader confused; too much detail will burden the reader with irrelevant information. It should be considered when using appendices and/or a supplemental website for more detailed information.

Participant (Subject) Characteristics

Appropriate identification of research participants is critical to the science and practice of psychology, particularly for generalizing the findings, making comparisons across replications, and using the evidence in research syntheses and secondary data analyses. If humans participated in the study, report the eligibility and exclusion criteria, including any restrictions based on demographic characteristics.

Research Design

Specify the research design in the method section. Were subjects manipulated, or were they observed naturalistically? If multiple conditions were created, how were participants assigned to conditions, through random assignment or some other selection mechanism? Was the study conducted as a between-subjects or a within-subject design?

RESULT / نتائج and DISCUSSION / مناقشة

Results should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Highlight the differences between the results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.

The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. In the discussion, it is the most significance section of the article. Here you get the chance to make your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a brief summary of the main scientific findings (not experimental results).

The following components should be covered in discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what)? Do you provide interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences?

After presenting the results, you are in a position to evaluate and interpret their implications, especially with respect to your original hypotheses. Here you will examine, interpret, and qualify the results and draw inferences and conclusions from them. Emphasize any theoretical or practical consequences of the results. (When the discussion is relatively brief and straightforward, some authors prefer to combine it with the Results section, creating a section called Results and Discussion.)

End the Discussion section with a reasoned and justifiable commentary on the importance of your findings. This concluding section may be brief or extensive provided that it is tightly reasoned, self-contained, and not overstated. In this section, you might briefly return to a discussion of why the problem is important (as stated in the introduction); what larger issues, those that transcend the particulars of the subfield, might hinge on the findings; and what propositions are confirmed or disconfirmed by the extrapolation of these findings to such overarching issues.

Result and discussion should be presented in the same part, clearly and briefly. Discussion part should contain the benefit of research result, not repeat result part. Result and discussion part can be written in the same part to avoid extensive quotation.

DISCUSSION / مناقشة

Conclusions should answer the objectives of research. Tells how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. Without clear Conclusions, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge the work, and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. Do not repeat the Abstract, or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You should also suggest future experiments and/or point out those that are underway.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT (OPTIONAL) / شكر وتقدير (إختياري)

Acknowledgment is addressed to a person and/or groups and also the institution that helps research both in a direct and indirect way.

REFERENCE / مراجع

In writing a bibliography, JIDeR Journal uses the American Psychological Association 7^th edition (APA 7^th  style). For efficient writing of citations, use the Zotero, Mondeley, or Endnote application in Microsoft Word.

Byman, R. (2005). Curiosity and sensation seeking: A conceptual and empirical examination. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1365-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.004
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0040957
Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 673-683. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150605
Herráez, A. (2006). Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Education, 34 (4), 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644
Johnson, J. A. (1997). Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 73-93). Academic Press.
Kennedy, M. (2018, October 15). To prevent wildfires, PG&E pre-emptively cuts power to thousands inCalifornia. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2018/10/15/657468903/to-prevent-wildfires-pg-e-preemptively-cuts-power-to-thousands-in-california
Lamanauskas, V. (2019). 3rd international Baltic symposium on science and technology education “Science and technology education: Current challenges and possible solutions (BalticSTE2019)”: Symposium review. Švietimas: politika, vadyba, kokybė / Education Policy, Management and Quality, 11(1), 42-48. http://oaji.net/articles/2019/513-1567660630.pdf
Nasledov, A. (2005). SPSS: komp'juternyj analiz dannyh v psihologii i social'nyh naukah [SPSS: Computer analysis of data in psychology and social sciences]. Piter.
Novák, M., & Langerová, P. (2006). Raising efficiency in teaching mathematics in non-English speaking countries: An electronic bilingual dictionary of mathematical terminology. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on the teaching of mathematics at the undergraduate level. Istanbul: TMD (Turkish Mathematical Society), 2006. [CD-ROM].
Posner, M. (2004). Neural systems and individual differences. TC Record. http://www.tcrecord.org/PrintContent.asp?ContentID=11663
Sidorenko, E. V. (2002). Metody matematicheskoj obrabotki v psihologii [Methods of mathematical processing in psychology]. Rech'.
Šlekienė, V., & Lamanauskas, V. (2019). Sisteminis „judėjimo“ sąvokos turinio integravimas, kaip viena iš visuminio gamtamokslinio ugdymo prieigų [Systematic integration of the content of "Movement" concept as one of the approaches to comprehensive natural science education]. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 16(1), 43-53. http://oaji.net/articles/2019/514-1563213127.pdf
Thurstone, L. L. (1959). The measurement of attitude: A psycho-social method and some experiments. Univerity of Chicago.
Vaitkevičius, J. (1995). Socialinės pedagogikos pagrindai [Basics of social pedagogy]. Egalda.
Walker, J., Halliday, D., & Resnick, R. (2008). Fundamentals of physics. Wiley.

Copyright Notice

The copyright of the received article once accepted for publication shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission : 0.00 (IDR)

Article in Review : 0.00 (IDR)

Article Processing Charge : 200.000 (IDR)

Basically, JIDeR does not charge Submission, Processing, and Publication Fees. However, to ensure the quality of editing, JIDeR has collaborated with the professional copy editor and layout editor. In addition, the fee is used to pay for web, hosting, and DOI.